[cisco-bba] cisco-bba Digest, Vol 40, Issue 4

[Mark Tohill]

Yes, I saw that yesterday. I apologise. I knew there had been a
discussion on that before but didn't realise I was to blame.

It sounds as if there isn't much control over it and the LAC can send
pretty well much what it likes.

With no other tools, it's difficult figuring out whether a customer is
congesting a link.

Thanks,
Mark


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 14:14:21 +0100
From: Euan Galloway <euang+cisco-bba at lists.eusahues.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [cisco-bba] BW metric on L2TP VPDN
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net, cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <20060912131421.GA29377 at hyperion.eusahues.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 10:54:09AM +0100, Mark Tohill wrote:

> I heard that this was connected to the type of DSLAM?
> Is this true?

I was going to say "wasn't this in cisco-bba archives", then I noticed
it 
was you that started the discussion about it quite a while ago ;-)

It's still the case on BT IPStream.

Quickly looking at one device I can see almost exactly 50% with valid i
looking BW and 50% with the interface speed.

-- 
Euan Galloway


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
cisco-bba mailing list
cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba


End of cisco-bba Digest, Vol 40, Issue 4
****************************************