<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>From what I can understand, your Cisco 7206 is not routing to
the backup route when the primary route fails. I’m not a router
jock, but I’m guessing that’s because the 7206 has no reason to
update its route entry. When the HDSL link goes down the link status on
the 7206 may not go down. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Here’s some good articles on this topic:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><a href="http://www.nil.com/ipcorner/SmallSiteMultiHoming/">http://www.nil.com/ipcorner/SmallSiteMultiHoming/</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><a href="http://www.nil.com/ipcorner/RedundantMultiHoming/">http://www.nil.com/ipcorner/RedundantMultiHoming/</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><a href="http://blog.ioshints.info/search/label/load%20balancing">http://blog.ioshints.info/search/label/load%20balancing</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><a href="http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/tag/load-balancing/">http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/tag/load-balancing/</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Frank<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
cisco-bba-bounces@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-bba-bounces@puck.nether.net] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Matteo<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, January 18, 2009 5:03 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> cisco-bba@puck.nether.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [cisco-bba] cisco dual wan atm<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>Hi,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>I have this problem, I work to ISP, in our pop we have a
Cisco 7206VXR with ATM card that manage all adsl and hdsl our customers, now we
have this pronblem, one customer have Cisco 1721 with wic-1adsl and wic-1t, he
use wic-1adsl by adsl that arrive to our Cisco 7206, and wic-1t with modem
frame-relay to atm that also arrive to our same Cisco 7206.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>On Cisco 1721 at FA0 it have public subnet ip that can
reacheable from adsl and hdsl (frame-relay). <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>He would use HDSL as primary line and adsl as backup. On
1721 I setup two default route the first to s0.1 with 0 and second to atm0.1
with 10, so when s0.1 go down it use atm0.1. From other side (inside our pop)
on cisco 7206 I use same conf but in route I use not interface but next hop,
when it made unreachable route don't delete and so not work ??<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>Thank you<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class=MsoNormal>Matteo<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>