[cisco-nas] Problems with rate-limit
Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
achatz at forthnet.gr
Thu Dec 4 12:21:44 EST 2003
Juts watch for dropped packets + current burst using "sh int rate" and increase
accordingly the burst values.
Richard Greasley wrote:
> Yes, actually I just did, however not with the burst...
> I was running a test with the customer and from I've found.
> rate-limit output 960000 10000 20000 conform-action transmit exceed-action
> drop
> rate-limit input 960000 10000 20000 conform-action transmit exceed-action
> drop
> Seems to be keeping them at around 256kb/s
>
> regards,
> Richardg;
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tassos Chatzithomaoglou" <achatz at forthnet.gr>
> To: "Richard Greasley" <richardg at blue-stream.net>
> Cc: <cisco-nas at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-nas] Problems with rate-limit
>
>
>
>>Did you try to raise the values of your rate limit, especially the burst
>
> ones (8000,12000)?
>
>>
>>Richard Greasley wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hello all,
>>>We have a problem with rate-limiting on our cisco 7204VXT running IOS
>>>12.2(7a).
>>>The problem is that I'm seeing packet loss on this FastEthernet link.
>>>I did a standard cisco ping (not extended) and I was getting 96-97%
>
> success
>
>>>rate, when I did an extended ping with settings:
>>>fate#ping
>>>Protocol [ip]:
>>>Target IP address: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
>>>Repeat count [5]: 1000
>>>Datagram size [100]: 1428
>>>Timeout in seconds [2]: 1
>>>Extended commands [n]: y
>>>Source address or interface:
>>>Type of service [0]:
>>>Set DF bit in IP header? [no]:
>>>Validate reply data? [no]: yes
>>>Data pattern [0xABCD]:
>>>Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]:
>>>Sweep range of sizes [n]: y
>>>Sweep min size [36]:
>>>Sweep max size [18024]:
>>>Sweep interval [1]:
>>>Type escape sequence to abort.
>>>Sending 17989000, [36..18024]-byte ICMP Echos to xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx,
>
> timeout is
>
>>>1 seconds: Reply data will be validated
>>>
>>>I got 81-83% success rate
>>>
>>>The interface settings are:
>>>interface FastEthernet0/0.135
>>> description UNDP IP Circuit, Ip block xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (255.255.255.224)
>>> encapsulation dot1Q 135
>>> ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.224
>>> ip accounting mac-address input
>>> ip accounting mac-address output
>>> rate-limit input 256000 8000 12000 conform-action transmit
>
> exceed-action
>
>>>drop
>>> rate-limit output 256000 80000 12000 conform-action transmit
>
> exceed-action
>
>>>drop
>>>
>>>When I remove the rate-limiting from the interface, both extended and
>>>regular, pings go through without any problems whatsoever, the customer
>
> is
>
>>>not using the circuit as yet.
>>>When I put back on rate-limiting and I did some ftp download tests from
>
> my
>
>>>end I saw that I was not getting even 16KB/s, removed the rate-limit and
>
> I
>
>>>was getting close to 6000KB/s.
>>>Anyone saw anything similar and/or have a solution to this?
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Richardg;
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>cisco-nas mailing list
>>>cisco-nas at puck.nether.net
>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas
>>>
>>
>>--
>>***************************************
>> Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios
>>Network Design & Development Department
>> FORTHnet S.A.
>> <achatz at forthnet.gr>
>>***************************************
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
***************************************
Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios
Network Design & Development Department
FORTHnet S.A.
<achatz at forthnet.gr>
***************************************
More information about the cisco-nas
mailing list