[cisco-nas] ATM/L2TP/PPP MTU question
Anastassios Chatzithomaoglou
achatz at forthnet.gr
Tue Jun 3 22:53:48 EDT 2003
If i leave it on the default (4470 from our side, 8000+ from telco's side) will there be
any problem?
What are the possibilites of such a HUGE packet? Are there any disadvantages?
Dennis Peng wrote:
> Tassos Chatzithomaoglou [achatz at forthnet.gr] wrote:
>
>>Here is the network diagram:
>>
>> DSL ATM ATM ATM ETH
>>ADSL CPE ----- DSLAM ----- ATM SWITCH ----- BBRAS ----- LNS ----- INTERNET
>> |-------------- PPPoE/A------------------||----L2TP---|
>> |----------------------- PPP -------------------------|
>>
>>What is the recommended MTU setting for the ip/atm connection between
>>BBRAS/LNS (default for ATM is 4470), if we have to :
>>
>>1. Do not change anything on user's side
>>2. Do not load BBRAS/LNS with extra fragmentation/reassembly
>>
>>Should i make it 1540 (1500 + 40 bytes of IP, UDP and L2TP headers) ?
>
>
> Yes, 1540 should do it if you are going Cisco to Cisco. If you are
> going inter-vendor, it depends on the L2TP header options the other
> vendor may use (eg. data sequencing would add additional
> overhead). You may want to increase to 1550 to be safe.
>
> Dennis
>
>
>>--
>>***********************************
>> Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios
>>Network Design & Operations Center
>> FORTHnet S.A.
>> <achatz at forthnet.gr>
>>***********************************
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-nas mailing list
>>cisco-nas at puck.nether.net
>>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas
>
>
--
***********************************
Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios
Network Design & Operations Center
FORTHnet S.A.
<achatz at forthnet.gr>
***********************************
More information about the cisco-nas
mailing list