[cisco-nas] Re: [cisco-bba] Modular QoS CLI vs CAR
Siva Valliappan
svalliap at cisco.com
Mon Sep 22 12:55:29 EDT 2003
inline
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Anastassios Chatzithomaoglou wrote:
> We are using CAR until now and we are thinking of moving to MQC (after a reccomendation
> from Vincent). We had already some tests with it and it seems to work fine.
>
> We are not interested (until now) about traffic class but only for traffic policy.
>
> In terms of performance and cpu usage which one is the best?
don't remember.
> In which one will CEF make a bigger difference?
>
both require CEF.
> Is this the right way to move on or should we stick to CAR?
>
you should move to MQC as all new QoS features will be built around the
MQC framework. e.g. there will be no new enhancements to CAR.
cheers
.siva
>
> --
> ***********************************
> Chatzithomaoglou Anastasios
> Network Design & Operations Center
> FORTHnet S.A.
> <achatz at forthnet.gr>
> ***********************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-bba mailing list
> cisco-bba at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-bba
>
More information about the cisco-nas
mailing list