[cisco-nas] Disable modems on AS5300?
Charles Gregory
cgregory at hwcn.org
Tue Nov 9 13:21:40 EST 2004
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Aaron Leonard wrote:
> Hi Charles,
> You can mark modems bad on an AS5300 in a couple of
> ways ... manually:
> router(config)#line <begin> <end>
> router(config-line)#modem bad
I found this online, and implemented it for a quick fix.
> or automatically, you can use the "modem recovery" feature
I like the sound of this. I will set it up. Thanks!
- Charles
> to take modems out of service (and/or to reload portware
> into them) if they have too many consecutive trainup failures
> (see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/76/modem-recovery.html .)
>
> As far as whether these modems are truly bad (from the hardware
> standpoint) ... this is very rare although not unheard. Before you
> conclude that these modems are bad, I'd recommend first that you
> load the latest (2.9.5.0) portware on them and see how they do.
>
> If you need to do further modem hardware troubleshooting, see:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/108/mica-hw-ts-17882.html .
>
> Regards,
>
> Aaron
>
> ---
>
> Charles Gregory wrote:
>
> >Hallo!
> >
> >I've got some flakey modems on an AS5300.
> >sho modem indicates 66% connection success rate on 12 modems.
> >
> >I am trying to RTFM, to find the answers to this question, but
> >in the meantime, does anyone know, off the top of their head, how to mark
> >a modem bad? Also, I notice in my sho modem list that 6 modems are
> >*already* marked bad. Is there any way the firmware can do this on its
> >own? Or does this mean I was sold a unit with bad modems in it?
> >
> >Any other recommendations for testing/debugging these modems?
> >Is there a possibility they just need to be 'reset' in some way?
> >Or do I need to be replacing them?
> >
> >Thanks in advance.
> >
> >- Charles
> >
> >Relevant sho modem section......
> >B 1/30 00:23:26 359 18 0 0 0 0 0 95%
> >B 1/31 00:24:18 365 15 0 0 0 0 0 96%
> >B 1/32 00:21:48 366 20 0 0 0 0 0 95%
> >B 1/33 00:26:13 344 13 0 0 0 0 0 96%
> >B 1/34 00:19:13 380 20 0 0 0 0 0 95%
> >B 1/35 00:25:39 349 15 0 0 0 0 0 96%
> > 1/36 00:18:43 351 181 0 0 0 0 0 66%
> > 1/37 00:13:01 404 173 0 0 0 0 0 70%
> > 1/38 00:18:37 339 178 0 0 0 0 0 66%
> > 1/39 00:14:43 371 192 0 0 0 0 0 66%
> > 1/40 00:18:12 359 180 0 0 0 0 0 67%
> > 1/41 00:16:15 375 173 0 0 0 0 0 68%
> > 1/42 00:16:07 362 182 0 0 0 0 0 67%
> > 1/43 00:14:23 395 176 0 0 0 0 0 69%
> > 1/44 00:14:44 383 186 0 0 0 0 0 67%
> > 1/45 00:19:44 344 177 0 0 0 0 1 66%
> > 1/46 00:15:01 388 178 0 0 0 0 0 69%
> > 1/47 00:14:28 373 188 0 0 0 0 0 66%
> >* 2/0 00:28:48 419 25 0 0 0 0 0 94%
> >* 2/1 00:21:38 460 20 0 1 0 0 0 96%
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-nas mailing list
> >cisco-nas at puck.nether.net
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nas
> >
> >
>
More information about the cisco-nas
mailing list