[nsp] MSFC2 128,000 route limitation

Alex Rubenstein alex@nac.net
Sat, 24 Aug 2002 10:13:05 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)


something is clicking here.

We've a 6509, SUP2, MSFC2, in hybrid, known as switch8.oct and msfc1.oct
(same physical box):

switch8.oct> sho ver
[ ... ]
       DRAM                    FLASH                   NVRAM
Module Total   Used    Free    Total   Used    Free    Total Used  Free
------ ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ----- ----- -----
1      130944K  91643K  39301K  32768K  23031K   9737K  512K  377K  135K


msfc1.oct#sho mem
                Head    Total(b)     Used(b)     Free(b)   Lowest(b)  Largest(b)
Processor   41C77780   473467008   124689452   348777556   212393264   140669952
      I/O    E000000    33554432     5466480    28087952    18835872    21579388


msfc1.oct#sh ip bgp sum
BGP router identifier 209.123.12.59, local AS number 8001
BGP table version is 19384378, main routing table version 19384378
112889 network entries and 241992 paths using 19887723 bytes of memory
63868 BGP path attribute entries using 3832440 bytes of memory
2 BGP rrinfo entries using 48 bytes of memory
36775 BGP AS-PATH entries using 938972 bytes of memory
160 BGP community entries using 4898 bytes of memory
134038 BGP route-map cache entries using 2144608 bytes of memory
0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
Dampening enabled. 48 history paths, 11 dampened paths
3 received paths for inbound soft reconfiguration
BGP activity 317162/22307871 prefixes, 11082573/10840581 paths, scan interval 15 secs

There are about 20 peers on this, three of which are full views.


seperately, we have a 6509, sup1, msfc2, in integrated:

msfc1.nyc>sho mem
                Head    Total(b)     Used(b)     Free(b)   Lowest(b)  Largest(b)
Processor   42017080   467570560   144717408   322853152   293755012   192841908
      I/O    DE00000    35651584     8754888    26896696    24740584    26866364

(how do you check free SUP ram on an integrated box?)

msfc1.nyc#sho ip bgp sum
BGP router identifier 209.123.12.4, local AS number 8001
BGP table version is 17174893, main routing table version 17174893
112903 network entries and 323852 paths using 22836069 bytes of memory
105107 BGP path attribute entries using 6307800 bytes of memory
3 BGP rrinfo entries using 72 bytes of memory
49711 BGP AS-PATH entries using 1407988 bytes of memory
243 BGP community entries using 7002 bytes of memory
179720 BGP route-map cache entries using 2875520 bytes of memory
0 BGP filter-list cache entries using 0 bytes of memory
Dampening enabled. 95 history paths, 45 dampened paths
11 received paths for inbound soft reconfiguration
BGP activity 300078/110778093 prefixes, 14305643/13981791 paths, scan interval 15 secs

This box has about 50 to 70 peers, two are full views, seven or so are
internal mesh, and the rest range from 0 to several thousand.

If you want, http://eng.nac.net/lookingglass/ has ways for you to access
both of these boxes if you please.

Hope this helps.





On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, George Boulescu wrote:

>
>
> Some weeks ago we wanted to have a full bgp table in an 6500 (we wanted to
> test if it will cope with it after an 128-to-512 memory upgrade on the
> MSFC).
>
> The machine runs native IOS and has more de 30 bgp peering with a total of
> around 7000 routes.
>
> First we hit it with around 60000-70000 from a border router. The things
> weren't fine but it was almost ok, meaning that we were going really low
> on free memory on the SUP2, which had 128M. At the end of this proces we
> had around 4-5Mbytes free on the SUP2.
>
> My questions are:
>
> - are the prefix-stats using memory from the SUP or from the MSFC ?
> - is there any part-number for upgrading the memory on the SUP2 ?
> - did anyone tried to install a 512M SODIMM (like the one on the MSFC2,
> I think they are identical) in the SUP2 ?
> - from the memory consuption point of view, which is using more memory -
> the hybrid configuration or the native IOS configuration ?
> - in this circumstances (with 128M on SUP2 and 512M on MSFC2) what should
> I use if I really want to have the full bgp table ?
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> --
>
> George Boulescu
> Senior Network Engineer
> RoEduNet Bucharest NOC
> CCAI, CCNA
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
--    Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net   --