[nsp] From the baby to the beast
Stephen J. Wilcox
steve@telecomplete.co.uk
Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:41:52 +0000 (GMT)
dont forget its only one packet for each flow.. i dont know for sure but i'd
imagine a single gaming session altho udp is continous and therefore only one
flow.
and if you make your cache timeout a little larger than usual (most ppl use 1min
i believe) that will reduce the amount of accounting also.
i dont see why the routers cant hack it, guess you can always try it - you can
turn on the netflow accounting even if your not collecting the data and see what
the load looks like, be prepared for a quick backout ;)
a final thought is if all you want to do is analyse bandwidth on a per host
basis can you not achieve this with mac accounting and snmp?
Steve
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Darren Smith wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> After a bit of advice here :-)
>
> We currently have Cisco 7401's as our edge routers, backhauling traffic back
> to a pair of Cat6509's & SUP2's.
>
> One of the projects this year will involve accounting, i'm assuming via
> NETFLOW (unless theres a better way to do it?)
>
> Basically I need to analyse traffic from thousands of endpoints to the few
> hundred servers connected the the 6509's.
>
> In a near-to-realtime basis if possible :-(
>
> It works fine with small traffic volumes (200mb peak between all edges) but
> they're looking at expanding this to over 800Mb/sec, at which point my ickle
> 7401's will surely die ;-)
>
> To make matters worse it's gaming type traffic, so small packet sizes and
> high pps counts.
>
> So two questions (well three really i suppose) :-)
>
> 1. Has anyone actually got netflow accounting working on Cisco 6509's?
> reliably?
>
> 2. If I went down the GSR route, how does that handle netflow? (It's sampled
> isn't it?) and how much different is a GSR to traditional Cisco routers (i.e
> much to learn? - I've used 7xxx/65xx/58xx equipment so far).
>
> The last question is one that might be better suited to offlist, so I don't
> cause a riot :-) (i.e Would you even look at Cisco? What about Juniper?)
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Regards
>
> Darren Smith
> Game Digital Ltd
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>