[nsp] BGP requirements

[Steve Francis]

Z wrote:

>   Essentially this guy will probably house just T1 circuit with a
>currently unknown provider to do BGP for failover purposes should
>our colocation fail miserably.   Maybe there is a better standard
>alternative to this since we just have a /24.  If so, I'd love to
>hear alternatives or providers that will even do BGP with a /24 to
>some extent.
>
>  
>
If  its just failover, you dont need full routing tables, and a 3600 
could do fine.  Just take default from the two upstreams, and weight 
them differently...