[nsp] known issues with 12.0.21S ?
Jared Mauch
jared@puck.nether.net
Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:13:59 -0400
12.0(21)S1 and later have proven very stable in our environment.
I can see no reason you shouldn't upgrade.
- jared
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:49:12PM +0200, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
>
> Hello,
> we have been instructed to upgrade to 12.0.21S on our 12416s in order
> to support the 4 port STM-16 card.
> Anyone else using such setup? Any known issues ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Pf
>
>
> --
>
> This E-Mail has NOT been scanned for viruses, so it may be NOT CLEAN.
> Wash your hands before meals.
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Pierfrancesco Caci | System Administrator @ seabone.net
> p.caci@seabone.net | Telecom Italia S.p.A. - International Wholesale Svcs
> Linux paperino 2.4.18-rc1 #1 Thu Feb 14 15:55:54 CET 2002 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.