[nsp] known issues with 12.0.21S ?

Jared Mauch jared@puck.nether.net
Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:13:59 -0400


	12.0(21)S1 and later have proven very stable in our environment.

	I can see no reason you shouldn't upgrade.

	- jared

On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:49:12PM +0200, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> we have been instructed to upgrade to 12.0.21S on our 12416s in order
> to support the 4 port STM-16 card. 
> Anyone else using such setup? Any known issues ?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Pf
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
>      This E-Mail has NOT been scanned for viruses, so it may be NOT CLEAN.
>                          Wash your hands before meals.
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Pierfrancesco Caci |            System Administrator @ seabone.net
>  p.caci@seabone.net |     Telecom Italia S.p.A. - International Wholesale Svcs
>      Linux paperino 2.4.18-rc1 #1 Thu Feb 14 15:55:54 CET 2002 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.