[nsp] PIX

Christopher McCrory cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Mon, 09 Sep 2002 07:38:42 -0700


Hello...


odusseus wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>>From the firewall's log (Cisco Pix 515), I got 22,000 messages from the same source IP address to the same IP destination 
> saying that: "invalid transport number, in which [...] destination port number for a protocol is zero." 

My money is on this being a probe.  IIRC firewalk, 
http://www.packetfactory.net/Projects/Firewalk, uses port 0 by default.


> 
> 
> Is it possible that someone sending a large amount of traffic to the firewall make this firewall unusable due to a cpu rate to 
> high ? 
> 
> Is it possible to pass through the firewall which is not able to filter any traffic due to its cpu high rate ? 
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Christophe
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------
> 
> Faites un voeu et puis Voila ! www.voila.fr 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



-- 
Christopher McCrory
  "The guy that keeps the servers running"

chrismcc@pricegrabber.com
  http://www.pricegrabber.com

Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and
no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is
no defense.  I tried it.  Only tinfoil works.