[nsp] NPE-G1 for 7200
Jared Mauch
jared@puck.nether.net
Wed, 11 Sep 2002 16:26:27 -0400
The builtin GE interfaces (it has 3 of them) does not
traverse the PCI bus so these 3 GE interfaces are 'freebies'
as far as the BW points go.
You would not use your PA-GE unless you want to see the
very limited performance these provide.
- jared
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 05:04:00PM -0300, Ezequiel Carson wrote:
> This is a very good point!!!..
>
> I would like to know how is this router configured in order handle 800M
> in backplain.
>
> I have a 7206VXR with NPE300 ,1 Gbic 1 Atm. (MPLS TAG-SWITCH.. enabled
> in both interfaces) and i can not put more that 350M aggregated. (cpu at
> 80%)
>
> Thanks
> Ezequiel
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 16:26, ml@vayner.net wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Does anyone have any experience with it already?
> > Can you share them with us?
> >
> > I am especially interested to know does it work as an LNS compared to
> > NPE400
> >
> > Thanks
> > Arie
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.