[nsp] NPE-G1 for 7200

[Jared Mauch]

	long prefix-lists.  The RSP8 came out
much earlier yet this similar device has only 512k NVRAM instead
of 2M (or more).

	Now arguably the 7200 can't be stacked full of
PA-MC-2T3+'s in the same way as a 7513 can for lots of interfaces
but access-lists, prefix-lists (for customer and peer filtering) do
consume a fair amount of space (even with service compress-config).

	- Jared
	
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 01:14:58AM +0300, ml@vayner.net wrote:
> What do you do on it that you run out of NVRAM?!
> 
> Arie
> 
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Jared Mauch wrote:
> 
> > 	I've seen some high cpu utilization on it when running 2xGE
> > at 800M+ that they have yet to resolve or provide explanation to.
> > 
> > 	Other than that it seems to provide a bit more life to
> > the 7200 series (other than the lack of NVRAM) in the high speed
> > interfaces.
> > 
> > 	- Jared
> > 
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:26:12PM +0300, ml@vayner.net wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > Does anyone have any experience with it already?
> > > Can you share them with us?
> > > 
> > > I am especially interested to know does it work as an LNS compared to 
> > > NPE400
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > Arie
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list  real_name)s@puck.nether.net
> > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > 
> > 
> 

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.