[nsp] pix and mail servers

Robert E. Seastrom rs@seastrom.com
21 Sep 2002 00:23:37 -0400


fingers <fingers@fingers.co.za> writes:

> I've seen many many mails of people who say mailgard is horrid.
> personally, I've never had a hassle with it. perhaps those more
> knowledgeable could specify which part(s) of mailgard break, which rfc
> they go against, or how in general it breaks delivery of mail when
> enabled?

If it's anything like CBAC under 12.1 and later (I believe the code
bases may be related), it doesn't pass through EHLO and thus breaks
breaks all ESMTP (including AUTH and STARTTLS).  This is annoying.

                                        ---Rob