[nsp] stupid question

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 06:26:57PM -0500, Joshua Smith wrote:
> ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 se0/0 10.1.7.2
> ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 se0/0 10.1.7.1

I'm not really sure why you are putting an interface *and* a next-hop
IP into this route.  Especially for serial lines, either should be
sufficient (serial0/0 preferred).

Maybe the 10.1.7.* IP isn't visible due to the BGP changes, and thus
it considers the next-hop for the route unreachable.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering at physik.tu-muenchen.de