[nsp] QoS vs. Stable IOS

[Ezequiel Carson]

> I would go for 12.2S as it's the "new" service provider train. Stability
> shouldn't be that bad ..
>
Im running 12.2(24)S and i have big problem with the CLI. after large
amoun of TELNET Data,the connection dies. I have tried to solve it using
the scheduler proccess allocation time but it was not possible for me.

Ezeq.

On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 15:03, Michael Lyngbøl wrote:
> On 23.04.2003 17:39:35 -0300, Luciano wrote:
> > People,
> > 
> > The question is quiet simple...
> > 
> > How do you accomplish or implement QoS while using an IOS which is intended
> > for SPs ?
> > 
> > As far as I know all of us usually prefer to use a code from the mainline
> > 12.0S in "Core" Routers, and live as far as possible from T version.
> > 
> > The problem is 12.0S does NOT support many of QoS tools (CBWFQ, LLQ, etc).
> > 
> > May be 12.2(14)S comes up to shine our life, but upto now is too young to
> > say that is a Stable version.
> 
> I would go for 12.2S as it's the "new" service provider train. Stability
> shouldn't be that bad ..
> 
> > Meanwhile... ?
> 
> 12.1E ?
> 
> Regards,
> /Michael
> 
> -- 
> Michael Lyngbøl -- michael at lyngbol dot dk
> Network Manager, AS3292 TDC, IP·backbone
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>