[nsp] 12.2(14)S1 vs. 12.0(25)S?
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Thu Apr 24 01:11:37 EDT 2003
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 03:55:05PM -0400, Greg Steele wrote:
> For what it's worth, 12.2(14)S1 has some ATM SVC bugs that were fixed
> about a year ago in 12.0S ..
Could you elaborate on that? I was considering moving one of our ATM VC
routers from 12.2M to 12.2S to get native IPv6...
Any bugids, perhaps?
gert
PS: on the original question: we're happy so far with 12.2(14)S on two
7200s (NPE-400 and NPE-G1). The "address-family" stuff in BGP is a bit
weird with peer-groups, but this is being worked on, as far as I understand,
and no show-stopper anyway. OSPFv3 would be nice, though.
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert.doering at physik.tu-muenchen.de
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list