[nsp] 12.2(14)S1 vs. 12.0(25)S?

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Thu Apr 24 01:11:37 EDT 2003


Hi,

On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 03:55:05PM -0400, Greg Steele wrote:
> For what it's worth, 12.2(14)S1 has some ATM SVC bugs that were fixed
> about a year ago in 12.0S .. 

Could you elaborate on that?  I was considering moving one of our ATM VC
routers from 12.2M to 12.2S to get native IPv6...

Any bugids, perhaps?

gert

PS: on the original question: we're happy so far with 12.2(14)S on two
7200s (NPE-400 and NPE-G1).  The "address-family" stuff in BGP is a bit
weird with peer-groups, but this is being worked on, as far as I understand,
and no show-stopper anyway.  OSPFv3 would be nice, though.
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering at physik.tu-muenchen.de


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list