[nsp] Performance L2 and L3: Cat3550-EMI 5500SVIII+RMS
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Thu Apr 24 16:24:30 EDT 2003
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 02:54:41PM +0200, sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
> > any idea what kind of REAL performance difference exist between
> > Cat3550-EMI 5500SVIII+RMS on at L2 first and later on L3-L4?
>
> Well, the 3550 can do line rate both for L2 and L3. I
> have no idea what the 5500 can do.
Neither.
The 5500 backplane has some 3.6 Gbit (all 3 backplanes together), and the
L3 engines (RSM/RSFC) are spec'ed for some 200 Mbit (RSM) or 400 Mbit (RSFC)
throughput each.
The 5500 is a good and very solid switch, but "raw performance"-wise its
age is showing.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert.doering at physik.tu-muenchen.de
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list