[nsp] RE: Route maps versus access-lists in NAT

[Jarrod Baumann]

Maybe people are planning ahead and implementing the correct solution 
the first time so if in fact they need to manipulate it later on by
using the multiple features of route-maps.. they can.

J
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Ejay Hire wrote:

:
:
:Can someone explain why some use Route maps instead of access-lists for NAT statements?  I am specifically referring to simple match access-lists with no set statements.  This seems to be an additional level of uneeded complexity.
:Thanks, 
:Ejay 
:
:_______________________________________________
:cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
:http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
:archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
: