[nsp] Cisco problem

[Michael Loftis]

I seem to recall CEF + MLPPP not working at all, but CEF w/ say OSPF and 
equal cost/path routing did distribute load nicely, with much less CPU.

--On Thursday, August 14, 2003 10:20 PM +0200 Gert Doering 
<gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:47:47AM -0700, Steve Francis wrote:
>> That's news to me.  Any cco reference?
>>
>> > Cisco does not recommend CEF on serial interfaces, you can globally
>> > enable CEF, then manually disable CEF for the serial interfaces.
>
> Doesn't make any sense to me either.   What good is an advanced switching
> method if you don't use it on *all* interfaces?
>
> Actually I'd love to see Cisco drop all other switching paths (fast,
> optimum, distributed fast/optimum, etc.) to simplify the code...
>
> gert
>
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>
> //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> gert at greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025
> gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/