[nsp] load balancing bug?

[Dan Hollis]

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 jlewis at lewis.org wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Dan Hollis wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Voll, Scott wrote:
> > > Use per packet rather then the Per destination.
> > fwiw, that didnt work either. its still always using only one path.
> What are the interfaces for the paths?

fwiw this was working fine up until a few days ago, then it mysteriously 
stopped working -- without any configuration changes at all.

i'm suspecting an IOS bug, but this is a particularly busy core router i 
am loathe to reboot.

#sh ip cef 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 det
0.0.0.0/0, version 1361, per-destination sharing
0 packets, 0 bytes
  via x.x.110.177, 0 dependencies, recursive
    traffic share 1
    next hop x.x.110.177, ATM1/0.4034 via x.x.110.176/30
    valid adjacency
  via y.y.180.2, 0 dependencies, recursive
    traffic share 1
    next hop y.y.180.2, ATM1/0.4032 via y.y.180.0/30
    valid adjacency
  0 packets, 0 bytes switched through the prefix
  tmstats: external 0 packets, 0 bytes
           internal 0 packets, 0 bytes