[nsp] limits to CEF per-packet load sharing?

Duane de Witt duane at uis.co.za
Fri Feb 14 11:04:04 EST 2003


Hi

We use MLPPP and are very happy with it - I think it would be easier than
messing around with the CEF.

Regards
Duane
Siemens Business Services

-----Original Message-----
From: Edward Henigin [mailto:ed at staff.texas.net] 
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 6:11 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [nsp] limits to CEF per-packet load sharing?

Has anyone run into any limits over the number of interfaces that
CEF per-packet load sharing will work?

I've got a customer who wants 10 T1's (please, just don't ask :)
and we're pondering using MLPPP or CEF per-packet load sharing.
What's the most # of interfaces you've ever run CEF per-packet
load sharing, and seen it work well?

BTW, our side will be a 7500 or 7200, and the client side will be
a 7200.

Thanks,

Ed
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list