[nsp] C7200 Bandwidth Points
Huw Jones (hjones)
hjones at cisco.com
Mon Jul 14 12:17:10 EDT 2003
Have you seen the new PA-adapter card on the 7304 yet ?
Details at
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps352/products_data_sheet
09186a0080145f58.html
Cheers
Huw
*********************************************************************
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:jason at lixfeld.ca]
> Sent: 11 July 2003 21:24
> To: Gert Doering
> Cc: Temkin, David; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [nsp] C7200 Bandwidth Points
>
>
> Cat6500 with the PA blades will do that. Although the footprint is
> bigger; maybe the lesser of two evils, depending.
>
> Do the Cat4000s take the PA blades as well , ooc?
>
> On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 4:09 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 03:12:53PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> >> VXRs are godly!
> >
> > They still have a limit of 600 bandwidth points per bus,
> which can be
> > reached quite quickly if you have no NPE-G1, two FastEs on the IO
> > board, and some OC3 interfaces.
> >
> > I'm personally hoping for a "VXR++" chassis that has no
> "two busses"
> > architecture anymore, but something like a crossbar fabric with a
> > dedictated PCI "bus" per slot... saving PA investments (unlike the
> > 7300)
> > and still boosting the throughput.
> >
> > But I think this depends on whether Cisco sales or Cisco
> tech people
> > decide.
> >
> > gert
> > --
> > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> >
> > //www.muc.de/~gert/
> > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> > gert at greenie.muc.de
> > fax: +49-89-35655025
> > gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-> nsp
> archive at
> http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list