[nsp] [article]: Filters on routers: The price of performance

[Voralt]

Just another ridiculous magazine "real world test".  I like how they don't
take price into account, by comparing a $14k Lucent to a $11k Tasman to a
$6200 Cisco to a $3600 ImageStream.  If that's the case, then I would say,
compare apples to apples, set a max price of say $14k and then compare the
highest end prodct from each vendor at that price.  The Cisco 3725 is
$10,500 and the 3745 is $14k (by their numbers).

Also, why did they use two 10M connections instead of one 100M connection.
That seems a little odd to me.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ejay Hire" <ejay.hire at isdn.net>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 10:51 AM
Subject: RE: [nsp] [article]: Filters on routers: The price of performance


> Hi all.  Anyone else take exception to this?  My real-world and Lab
experiences with the 2600 series don't come anywhere close the latency and
throughput issues they describe.
>
> -Ejay
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hank Nussbacher [mailto:hank at att.net.il]
> > Sent: 15. júla 2003 9:13
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [nsp] [article]: Filters on routers: The price of performance
> >
> >
> > http://www.nwfusion.com/reviews/2003/0714rev.html
> >
> > -hank
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>