[nsp] 6500s and BGP

[Jared Mauch]

	I have a whole slew of 6500s (sup1, mfsc2) (sup2, mfsc2)
(and sup720).

	They are all running bgp (except the sup720's right now,
that may change in the future).  We've been running native and the
last major issues we had was somewhere around 12.1(5a)E6 that were
so critical that it destabalized our network.  We're planning
upgrades to 12.1(19)E1 here in the next little bit as it's been working
on a few new turn-ups as well as devices in the lab without problems.

	It also has ssh v2 support.

	We're not using any flexwan, so just
running c6sup12-pk2s-mz.121-19.E1.bin and c6sup22-pk2s-mz.121-19.E1.bin

	We haven't hit any major issues recently, we're just upgrading
to have consistent feature (bug) set across the network.

	- Jared

On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:22:05PM -0700, matthew zeier wrote:
> 
> Who's running 6509s in production with a full BGP feed?  We're having an
> internal discussion on whether this is a wise practice or not after hitting
> a static route/BGP bug a couple months ago.  Now we're only running OSPF.
> 
> Any feedback would be helpful.
> 
> 
> --
> matthew zeier                        | "Nothing in life is to be feared.
> InteleNet Communications, Inc.       |  It is only to be understood."
> (949) 784-7904                       |       - Marie Curie
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared at puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.