[nsp] service provider or service provider/vip ?
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri Jul 18 00:21:25 EDT 2003
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:13:37PM -0500, John Jackson wrote:
> Surely they didn't do away with vip support. As far as I know all non-vip
> cards are EOL, or will be soon. When I did a feature navigator to compare
> these two it said that these features are unique to sp/vip. Everything else
> is the same
> Distibuted Traffic Policing
[..]
> Distributed WFQ (dWFQ) support for RSVP
Of course you can only do "Distributed Anything" if you have CPU boards
to distribute *to* -> namely VIPs. The non-VIP line cards in a 7500 are
just "dumb" interface adaptors, no local CPU to do anything distributed.
> Also sp/vip is 5Mb larger
It contains much more IOS code :-)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list