[nsp] Re: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 8, Issue 65
C. Jon Larsen
jlarsen at richweb.com
Thu Jul 24 20:01:18 EDT 2003
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Victor M. Acosta wrote:
> I found a solution for it:
> I just add the following line to my ACL.
You might want to run netstat -an or netstat -ap on your server to see
what else is bound to ports > 1023 before deciding this is a "fix". You
might also want to consider a host based firewall for your ftp server for
the same reason.
>
> access-list 101 permit tcp any host <SERVER-IP> gt 1023
>
> If I only have the ftp-data and data open, when the FTP Client go to Passive
> it will open different ports. Therefore, you have to specify a range of
> addresses or open the greater-than (gt) <port number> "gt 1023" However, you
> will exposed all the ports going from 1024 to whatever.
>
> If this is a concern to you can use the Proftpd that someone else suggested
> on the last post. Thanks for everyone that respond.
>
>
>
>
>
> Victor M. Acosta El Paso Times
> 300 North Campbell St. IT
> El Paso TX, 79901
> Ph. (915) 546-6394 victorm at elpasotimes.com
> Fax.(915) 546-6346 victorm at eudoramail.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net>
> To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 3:07 PM
> Subject: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 8, Issue 65
>
>
> > Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to
> > cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > cisco-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of cisco-nsp digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. Re: Problem with DSL interface on a 2620 (Siva Valliappan)
> > 2. Re: 2621 keeps freezing (Z)
> > 3. Re: WU-FTPD and The Cisco router. (C. Jon Larsen)
> > 4. RE: Re: 2621 keeps freezing (Steve Rude)
> > 5. Re: Re: 2621 keeps freezing (Z)
> > 6. RE: Direction of manual summarization (Stephen Gill)
> > 7. Re: silly question... (Gert Doering)
> > 8. Re: silly question... (rpcbind at speakeasy.net)
> > 9. Intelligent Route Control? (Brian R. Watters)
> > 10. Re: silly question... (Streiner, Justin)
> > 11. RE: silly question... (Mike Carter)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:25:00 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Siva Valliappan <svalliap at cisco.com>
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] Problem with DSL interface on a 2620
> > To: james <hackerwacker at cybermesa.com>
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.53.0307241121450.7601 at sj-cse-717.cisco.com>
> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> >
> > you have configured the atm interface for ip routing. you will need
> > to configure it to bridge packets if the telco is bridging. this
> > can be done by using RBE if the platform/software you are using supports
> > RBE, if not by IRB. i notice you have a partial IRB config. in order
> > to complete it you will need to configure the ATM interface for bridging,
> > create a BVI interface, assign the IP address to the BVI interface, and
> > configure
> >
> > bridge X route ip
> > bridge X protocol [ieee | dec]
> >
> > where X is your bridge-group number
> >
> > cheers
> > .siva
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, james wrote:
> >
> > > Router is a cisco 2620 running c2600-js-mz.121-19.bin. I am seeking to
> > > give a static IP to a DSL customer (the telco provided CPE only supports
> bridging)
> > > while avoiding creating /30's for each static IP DSL user.
> > > On our 7206's I use "atm route-bridged ip" and write a static route to
> the interface
> > > but that is not supported till 3xxx series.
> > > I have used the below config on a 7206 in the past and it works, yet it
> is not working on the 2620.
> > > It is not supported in this series or am I missing something ?
> > >
> > > ip cef
> > > bridge irb
> > > !
> > > interface ATM1/1.2 multipoint
> > > description Static DSL Customers
> > > ip address 1.2.3.1 255.255.255.128
> > > no ip redirects
> > > no ip unreachables
> > > no ip mroute-cache
> > > !
> > > pvc 1/37
> > > protocol ip 1.2.3.2 no broadcast
> > > !
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > James Edwards
> > > Routing and Security
> > > jamesh at cybermesa.com
> > > At the Santa Fe Office: Internet at Cyber Mesa
> > > Store hours: 9-6 Monday through Friday
> > > Phone support 365 days till 10 pm via the Santa Fe office:
> > > 505-988-9200 or Toll Free: 888-988-2700
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:33:17 -0700
> > From: Z <z at wotb.org>
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] 2621 keeps freezing
> > To: "Daryl G. Jurbala" <daryl at introspect.net>
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Message-ID: <20030724173317.GC20152 at wotb.org>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 02:14:46PM -0400, Daryl G. Jurbala wrote:
> > > Are you graphing your CPU/bandwidth usage and getting syslog events sent
> > > somewhere (or SNMP traps)? If so, can you see any events leading up to
> > > the lockup?
> > >
> > > And how locked is the lockup? Even the console port?
> >
> >
> > Up to this point, I have not been able to get someone on the
> > console ( the router is remote and houses all connectivity to the
> > location ), but I had this in mind as well.
> >
> > The MRTG graphs don't show anything significant over the last 4
> > 'freezes' which weren't happening about the first 2 weeks this
> > router was in place. It just started happening on around the 15th
> > of the month and have had 4 crashes since the 15th. All of the
> > crashes have ocurred during business hours when traffic is pumping
> > through.
> >
> > In other words, as far as I can tell the router runs normally
> > without any noticeable spike of activity that would indicate what is
> > happening. This is why I asked if it is possibly a bug in the IOS
> > version.
> >
> >
> > .z
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:46:23 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: "C. Jon Larsen" <jlarsen at richweb.com>
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] WU-FTPD and The Cisco router.
> > To: "Victor M. Acosta" <victorm at elpasotimes.com>
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Message-ID:
> > <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307241443490.19624-100000 at foxx.richweb.com>
> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> >
> >
> > You could (should?) upgrade to an ftp daemon that is more secure and will
> > allow you to set your pasv port range. proftpd and pureftpd both can do
> > this. Set your range of pasv ports used by the ftp server to say,
> > 50000 to 50299. Then on your router's acl you can allow these ports
> > inbound to the ftp server. You can use a smaller or larger range of ports
> > depending on how many clients you have connected to your ftp service.
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Victor M. Acosta wrote:
> >
> > > Have any one hear or have problems dealing with WU-FTPD behind cisco
> > > routers (2600) series?
> > > The problem resides in that randomly users get stuck on the hand-shake
> > > between Client-Server
> > > the servers are behind a 2611 router with ISO :
> > > c2600-i-mz.123-1.bin
> > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(10r)1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
> > > cisco 2611 (MPC860) processor (revision 0x202) with 28672K/4096K bytes
> of
> > > memory.4
> > > Then after the Client authenticate I have a denied error and
> Access-List
> > > 101 like this:
> > > 02:27:06: %SEC-6-IPAC02:27:06: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGRL: access-list logging
> > > rate-limited or missed 2 packets
> > > 02:27:11: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 101 denied tcp 216.1.1.1(61777) ->
> > > 12.1.11.1(55816), 1 packet
> > >
> > > Where we have 216.1.1.1 is the FTP-Client (Any FTP Client Mac/PC )and
> > > 12.1.11.1 is the Server (RH 7.2) (wu-ftpd 2.6.2) behind the router. I am
> let
> > > in traffic to the 12.1.11.1 on ftp-data and ftp. I was researching over
> the
> > > internet and it seems that some other people that have similar setup had
> the
> > > same problems. I try their fixes and did not work. I wonder if someone
> can
> > > point me to the right direction.
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > > Victor M. Acosta El Paso Times
> > > 300 North Campbell St. IT
> > > El Paso TX, 79901
> > > Ph. (915) 546-6394 victorm at elpasotimes.com
> > > Fax.(915) 546-6346 victorm at eudoramail.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> >
> > --
> > + Jon Larsen: Chief Technology Officer, Richweb, Inc.
> > + Richweb.com: Providing Internet-Based Business Solutions since 1995
> > + GnuPG Public Key: http://richweb.com/jlarsen.gpg
> > + Business: (804) 359.2220 x 101; Mobile: (804) 307.6939
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:46:41 -0700
> > From: "Steve Rude" <steve at skyriver.net>
> > Subject: RE: [nsp] Re: 2621 keeps freezing
> > To: "Z" <z at wotb.org>
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Message-ID:
> > <5E43695CC08E3D43A722EB75F116BC293BC0BD at skyriverserver3.skyriver.net>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Do you have CEF turned on? CEF will drop CPU load significantly.
> >
> > In your acl's do you have the log statement? Every time you have a
> > packet hit the log statement, it will cause CPU cycles.
> >
> > Can you log into the router console when it freezes?
> >
> > I have several 2621's with 4 T1's running about 3-4 Mbps peak in a
> > Multilink bundle, and relatively small acls and I've never had a problem
> > with freezing. CPU runs about 40-60 percent at peak times.
> >
> > I run 12.2(8)T10, you might want to give that a shot.
> >
> > Good luck,
> >
> > --steve
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Z [mailto:z at wotb.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 9:42 AM
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [nsp] Re: 2621 keeps freezing
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 09:34:25AM -0700, z at wotb.org wrote:
> > >
> > > First off, this router hasn't exhibited hardware issues that I
> > > can tell.. but it replaced 2 2621's. The Internet T1 used to be on
> > > another 2621 entirely, while the other 2621 had everything listed
> > > above except that T1 ( and had an ethernet interface to the Internet
> > > 2621 ). The load was high on the non-Internet T1 and it only had
> > > 32MB of memory, but it never froze up completely requiring a reset.
> >
> > That should have read "The load was high on the non-Internet T1
> > router, and it would seem to drop EIGRP hello's and cause adjacency
> > issues every now and then.. so I thought it might've been a memory
> > issue so I upgraded another 2621 and sent it out, but the old router
> > never froze up completely requiring a reset.. it would just get
> > slow."
> >
> > So yes, add EIGRP to the list of things this router is running as
> > well.
> >
> >
> > .z
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:57:04 -0700
> > From: Z <z at wotb.org>
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] Re: 2621 keeps freezing
> > To: Steve Rude <steve at skyriver.net>
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Message-ID: <20030724175704.GD20152 at wotb.org>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:46:41AM -0700, Steve Rude wrote:
> > > Do you have CEF turned on? CEF will drop CPU load significantly.
> > >
> > > In your acl's do you have the log statement? Every time you have a
> > > packet hit the log statement, it will cause CPU cycles.
> > >
> > > Can you log into the router console when it freezes?
> > >
> > > I have several 2621's with 4 T1's running about 3-4 Mbps peak in a
> > > Multilink bundle, and relatively small acls and I've never had a problem
> > > with freezing. CPU runs about 40-60 percent at peak times.
> > >
> > > I run 12.2(8)T10, you might want to give that a shot.
> > >
> >
> > Yep, CEF is turned on. I don't have any logging ACLs, most of the
> > stuff I need to see can be looked at through just matches ( sh ip
> > access-list ).
> >
> > The next step is, *IF* it freezes to see if the console is still
> > responsive and if any logs are dumped to it.
> >
> > Also, the IPv4 protocol bug ACL was on the wrong interface until
> > just about an hour ago ( needed to be on the point-to-point
> > sub-interface instead of the parent interface, wasn't seeing any of
> > the permit ip any any matches.. so hopefully this was the cause of
> > my troubles.. but somehow I doubt it ).
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your input,
> >
> > .z
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 6
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:29:11 -0500
> > From: "Stephen Gill" <gillsr at yahoo.com>
> > Subject: RE: [nsp] Direction of manual summarization
> > To: <Jack.W.Parks at alltel.com>, <Rick.Cheung at NextelPartners.com>,
> > <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> > Message-ID: <000901c35219$dd601ef0$1efdfe0a at t23>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Use EIGRP stub at the remotes, and 'ip summary-address eigrp ...' at the
> > hub interface(s).
> >
> > -- steve
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> > Jack.W.Parks at alltel.com
> > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 1:24 PM
> > To: Rick.Cheung at NextelPartners.com; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: RE: [nsp] Direction of manual summarization
> >
> > The EIGRP Stub feature might fit your needs with or without
> > summarization
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1831/products_
> > configuration_guide_chapter09186a00800d97f8.html#1003712
> >
> > Jack W. Parks IV
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> > ALLTEL Communications
> > jack.w.parks at alltel.com
> > Work: 501-905-5961
> > Cell: 501-680-3341
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Cheung, Rick [mailto:Rick.Cheung at NextelPartners.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:59 AM
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [nsp] Direction of manual summarization
> >
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who replied on the 5 9's Infrastructure
> > question posted recently.
> >
> > I have a question on manual summarization. In practice, with
> > EIGRP in a hub/spoke network, do we typically summarize addresses
> > towards the core, or summarize it to the spokes? The intent is to limit
> > the EIGRP queries from rippling to the edge routers, as we're trying to
> > work around CSCdr91621 on our edge 4232 L3s.
> >
> > I believe, however, best practices state to localize queries,
> > and not propagate them to the core.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rick Cheung
> >
> >
> > This message, including any attachments, contains confidential
> > information intended for a specific individual and purpose and is
> > protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
> > sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies. You are
> > hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this
> > message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly
> > prohibited.
> >
> > WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
> > should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses.
> > The sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus
> > transmitted by this email. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to
> > be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted,
> > lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The
> > sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions
> > in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail
> > transmission.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 7
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:38:44 +0200
> > From: Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de>
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] silly question...
> > To: Mike Carter <mike.c at altatechnologies.com>
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Message-ID: <20030724213844.F20907 at greenie.muc.de>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 01:17:31PM -0500, Mike Carter wrote:
> > > We just upgraded to NPE-G1's and now have gaping holes in the I/O slots
> on
> > > our 7206's...anyone have a link or idea where to source the covers.
> >
> > Put the I/O board back in and enjoy an additional ethernet port...?
> >
> > gert
> > --
> > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> >
> //www.muc.de/~gert/
> > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> gert at greenie.muc.de
> > fax: +49-89-35655025
> gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 8
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: rpcbind at speakeasy.net
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] silly question...
> > To: Mike Carter <mike.c at altatechnologies.com>
> > Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> > Message-ID:
> > <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307241249190.30353-100000 at grace.speakeasy.net>
> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> >
> >
> > IO-CONTROLR-BLANK=
> >
> >
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/products/hw/routers/ps341/products_data_sheet09186a00800c6bd6.html
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Mike Carter wrote:
> >
> > > We just upgraded to NPE-G1's and now have gaping holes in the I/O slots
> on
> > > our 7206's...anyone have a link or idea where to source the covers.
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > >
> > > Michael Carter
> > > Sun/Cisco/IBM Sales
> > > Alta Technologies
> > > 763-475-5327 (direct)
> > > 800-546-2582 (Ext. 327)
> > > 763-475-5361 or 763-475-5346(Fax)
> > > AOL instant messenger mikec at alta
> > > email mike.c at altatechnologies.com
> > > Website www.altatechnologies.com
> > >
> > >
> > > ***To be removed from this mailing list simply reply with remove in the
> > > subject line***
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 9
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 12:50:52 -0700
> > From: "Brian R. Watters" <brwatters at abs-internet.com>
> > Subject: [nsp] Intelligent Route Control?
> > To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> > Message-ID: <20030724195350.8B110301C5 at exchange.abs-internet.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> >
> > Does anyone have any advise for route control based on real time link and
> or
> > destination performance? .. netVmg and others like Route Science are far
> to
> > expensive .. We of course would like to find a OpenSource solution to this
> > problem .. Anyone have a solution or experience with this sort of need?
> >
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 10
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 15:45:45 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: "Streiner, Justin" <streiner at stargate.net>
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] silly question...
> > To: Mike Carter <mike.c at altatechnologies.com>
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.51.0307241543020.25646 at lurch>
> > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Mike Carter wrote:
> >
> > > We just upgraded to NPE-G1's and now have gaping holes in the I/O slots
> on
> > > our 7206's...anyone have a link or idea where to source the covers.
> >
> > The part number is IO-CONTROLR-BLANK.
> >
> > jms
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 11
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 14:55:29 -0500
> > From: "Mike Carter" <mike.c at altatechnologies.com>
> > Subject: RE: [nsp] silly question...
> > To: "Streiner, Justin" <streiner at stargate.net>
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Message-ID: <NHBBKBJMGDGPHNNBELKLAELCFBAA.mike.c at altatechnologies.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
> >
> > Thanks for all the replies...Cisco is sending them out!
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Streiner, Justin [mailto:streiner at stargate.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 2:46 PM
> > To: Mike Carter
> > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] silly question...
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Mike Carter wrote:
> >
> > > We just upgraded to NPE-G1's and now have gaping holes in the I/O slots
> on
> > > our 7206's...anyone have a link or idea where to source the covers.
> >
> > The part number is IO-CONTROLR-BLANK.
> >
> > jms
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list
> > cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >
> >
> > End of cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 8, Issue 65
> > ****************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
--
+ Jon Larsen: Chief Technology Officer, Richweb, Inc.
+ Richweb.com: Providing Internet-Based Business Solutions since 1995
+ GnuPG Public Key: http://richweb.com/jlarsen.gpg
+ Business: (804) 359.2220 x 101; Mobile: (804) 307.6939
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list