[nsp] 12.2T vs 12.3
George Stylianou
georges at is.co.za
Wed Jul 30 22:41:01 EDT 2003
Here it is, but this is with 12.2T which works fine..
FastEthernet0/0
Throttle count 111
Drops RP 3983 SP 0
SPD Flushes Fast 165389 SSE 0
SPD Aggress Fast 163420
SPD Priority Inputs 0 Drops 0
Protocol Path Pkts In Chars In Pkts Out Chars Out
Other Process 1892 259987 3660 219600
Cache misses 0
Fast 0 0 0 0
Auton/SSE 0 0 0 0
IP Process 17399456 429897006 5769083 3995572390
Cache misses 0
Fast 391511408 2171004385 344129932 2060443322
Auton/SSE 0 0 0 0
ARP Process 21345 1280700 209 12540
Cache misses 0
Fast 0 0 0 0
Auton/SSE 0 0 0 0
George
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tomas Daniska [mailto:tomas at tronet.com]
> Sent: 30 July 2003 16:23
> To: George Stylianou; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: Spam: RE: [nsp] 12.2T vs 12.3
>
>
> do you have 'show interface switching' and others?
>
> if you do cef, try 'deb ip cef drops'
>
> --
>
> deejay
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: George Stylianou [mailto:georges at is.co.za]
> > Sent: 30. júla 2003 15:10
> > To: Tomas Daniska
> > Subject: Spam: RE: [nsp] 12.2T vs 12.3
> >
> >
> >
> > No,
> >
> > It does policy routing, wccp and has some gre tunnels as well
> >
> > George
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tomas Daniska [mailto:tomas at tronet.com]
> > > Sent: 30 July 2003 15:05
> > > To: George Stylianou; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > Subject: Spam: RE: [nsp] 12.2T vs 12.3
> > >
> > >
> > > do you do mpls + dot1q?
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > deejay
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: George Stylianou [mailto:georges at is.co.za]
> > > > Sent: 30. júla 2003 13:01
> > > > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > > Subject: Spam: RE: [nsp] 12.2T vs 12.3
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Speaking of 12.2T, 12.2(14)S and 12.3
> > > >
> > > > Anyone had any issues moving from 12.2T to either one of
> > the above?
> > > >
> > > > We tried on a 7206 npe-400 with PA-A3-T3 & PA-8T-X21=
> and had to
> > > > regress to 12.2T
> > > >
> > > > We immediately saw a lot of input errors, ignored packets
> > and input
> > > > drops on the FE. I tried switching to the second FE and got
> > > the same
> > > > result. This was with both 12.2S and 12.3
> > > >
> > > > I have a case open for it at the moment but havent got any
> > > > constructive feedback yet, just that the cards arent
> supported. Im
> > > > not sure what they
> > > > mean by that as the hardware/software matrix says 12.2S has
> > > > support for
> > > > the cards and the npe-400.
> > > >
> > > > We are also running 12.2(14)s on numerous other 7200's
> > > > npe-300/400/nse-1 and havent had the same issue.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone had a similar experience?
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > George
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > George Stylianou
> > > > Internet Solutions
> > > > Tel: (+27 11) 575 0465
> > > > Fax: (+27 11) 576 0465
> > > > Cell:(+27 83) 325 6894
> > > > E-mail: georges at is.co.za
> > > > Web: www.is.co.za
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at greenie.muc.de]
> > > > > Sent: 30 July 2003 10:05
> > > > > To: Charles Sprickman
> > > > > Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > > > Subject: Spam: Re: [nsp] 12.2T vs 12.3
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:24:22PM -0400, Charles
> > Sprickman wrote:
> > > > > > Which is the lesser of those two evils? There is a ton
> > > > of junk in
> > > > > > each of those that I'm sure introduces all sorts of bugs
> > > > I've never
> > > > > > even imagined. Which train will receive fixes first, and
> > > > > which would
> > > > > > you trust in a production ISP network?
> > > > >
> > > > > If 12.2S does what you need (haven't checked), I'd go
> for that.
> > > > >
> > > > > 12.2(14)S1 and up have the fix for the input-stuck bug, and
> > > > have been
> > > > > *extremely* well-behaved for everybody I've spoken to (except
> > > > > Jared, who has broken counters on CT3 interfaces, but
> everything
> > > > > else is working).
> > > > >
> > > > > gert
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> > > > >
> > > > > //www.muc.de/~gert/
> > > > > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> > > > > gert at greenie.muc.de
> > > > > fax: +49-89-35655025
> > > > > gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-> nsp archive at
> > > > > http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as
> > > > displayed at the following link. http://www.is.co.za/disc.asp
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as
> > displayed at the following link.
> > http://www.is.co.za/disc.asp
> >
> >
>
This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as displayed at the following link.
http://www.is.co.za/disc.asp
Should you not have Internet access, send a mail to disclaimers at is.co.za
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list