[nsp] Routing decisions on a PIX?

[Christopher McCrory]

Hello...


On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 11:51, Regis M. Donovan wrote:
> Hi there.
> I've got a pair of PIX boxes running 6.2(1), connected with a VPN.
> The networks are also connected by a back-end direct WAN line.  I
> would rather my traffic go over the WAN link instead of the VPN.
> 

You might try 6.3, it supports OSPF.


> Does the PIX consider the VPN to be a connected network?  When it
> comes time to make a routing decision, which takes precedence in a
> PIX: a VPN network connection or a static route?  
> 
> I've looked around on the cisco web site and couldn't find anything
> that directly addresses this.
> 
> Thanks!
> --Regis
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
-- 
Christopher McCrory
 "The guy that keeps the servers running"
 
chrismcc at pricegrabber.com
 http://www.pricegrabber.com
 
Let's face it, there's no Hollow Earth, no robots, and
no 'mute rays.' And even if there were, waxed paper is
no defense.  I tried it.  Only tinfoil works.