[nsp] ip load-sharing per-packet - cef accelerated ?

Bruce Robertson bruce at greatbasin.net
Mon Mar 10 15:58:53 EST 2003


In my opinion, MLPPP is a much better solution to the problem.  Yes there's
a bit of a CPU hit, but with two T1s, for example, you now have a true 3 Mb/s
pipe, not two 1.5 Mb/s pipes that are load balanced.  If a customer *needs*
say, 2 Mb/s, you can provide it.  We use MLPPP everywhere in our network,
and it always produces better results than load balancing.

--
Bruce Robertson, President/CEO				     +1-775-348-7299
Great Basin Internet Services, Inc.			fax: +1-775-348-9412
http://www.greatbasin.net




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list