[nsp] ip load-sharing per-packet - cef accelerated ?
Bruce Robertson
bruce at greatbasin.net
Mon Mar 10 15:58:53 EST 2003
In my opinion, MLPPP is a much better solution to the problem. Yes there's
a bit of a CPU hit, but with two T1s, for example, you now have a true 3 Mb/s
pipe, not two 1.5 Mb/s pipes that are load balanced. If a customer *needs*
say, 2 Mb/s, you can provide it. We use MLPPP everywhere in our network,
and it always produces better results than load balancing.
--
Bruce Robertson, President/CEO +1-775-348-7299
Great Basin Internet Services, Inc. fax: +1-775-348-9412
http://www.greatbasin.net
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list