[nsp] ip load-sharing per-packet - cef accelerated ?
Alex Rubenstein
alex at nac.net
Mon Mar 10 19:14:53 EST 2003
> > A good reason they tend to avoid it is it causes
> > out of order packets which result in lower end-to-end throughput.
>
> We found the opposite. per-packet CEF on links where it is supported
> result in tremendous performance increase and smoother utilization of the
> links.
Probably because you (and like many others) have had it fortunate enough
that packets aren't going out of order.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex at nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
-- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list