[nsp] ip load-sharing per-packet - cef accelerated ?

Terry Baranski terry at eurocompton.net
Mon Mar 10 21:17:41 EST 2003

What about Multilink Frame Relay?  Anyone have any experience with it?
I know WorldCom was working on "certifying" it with 3640's (at the time
it was only supported on a brand of router that I had never heard of)
back in September.  I haven't inquired about it since, though.


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dan Hollis
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Tony Tauber
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net; Jared Mauch
Subject: Re: [nsp] ip load-sharing per-packet - cef accelerated ?

On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Tony Tauber wrote:
> We've seen that MLPPP can work to distribute the load so that a given 
> flow can grow larger than the physical size of any of the component 
> parallel paths.  MLPPP isn't the CPU pig that it was in earlier 
> implementations or on different platforms.  Of course, YMMV.

Wonder if someone should work up a MLHDLC protocol. Something like MLPPP

without the PPP overhead.

[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]

cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list