[nsp] ip load-sharing per-packet - cef accelerated ?

Dan Hollis goemon at anime.net
Tue Mar 11 00:49:24 EST 2003

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
> > Wonder if someone should work up a MLHDLC protocol. Something like MLPPP 
> > without the PPP overhead.
> Considering that Cisco HDLC has the same overhead as PPP, why do you
> believe that MLHDLC would have less overhead than MLPPP?

Every reference I have indicates cisco HDLC is simpler than PPP and thus 
has less overhead. cisco HDLC has no LCP for example.

[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list