[nsp] ip load-sharing per-packet - cef accelerated ?

[Dan Hollis]

On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 sthaug at nethelp.no wrote:
> > Wonder if someone should work up a MLHDLC protocol. Something like MLPPP 
> > without the PPP overhead.
> Considering that Cisco HDLC has the same overhead as PPP, why do you
> believe that MLHDLC would have less overhead than MLPPP?

Every reference I have indicates cisco HDLC is simpler than PPP and thus 
has less overhead. cisco HDLC has no LCP for example.

-Dan
-- 
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]