[nsp] 12.0(22)S2 / 12.0(23)S1

[Larry Rosenman]

--On Saturday, March 15, 2003 12:47:08 +0100 Gert Doering 
<gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 07:30:54PM -0700, Cisco Geek Rotation wrote:
>> Hey what's the deal with the S train anyway?  Why run that instead of
>> the T  train?
>
> The S train is targetted at the ISPs, and usually has the things ISPs need
> (and those usually work, except for counters, which never do...) - while
> the T train is "generic new features and lots of exciting new bugs".
>
> I always avoid T if possible.
Speaking of Counters, have we determined that it's only the 32-bit counters 
that are fubar?


>
> gert
>
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>
> //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> gert at greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-35655025
> gert.doering at physik.tu-muenchen.de
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>



-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler at lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749