[nsp] eBGP routes not balancing
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Tue Nov 18 05:42:45 EST 2003
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:24:41AM -0800, Jeff Chan wrote:
> Note that I believe the mask for half of the Internet should
> be 127.255.255.255 rather than the 128.0.0.0 in your example.
Depends on whether you're ACL matching, or inserting routes. For ACL
matching, it's 127.255.255.255, yes.
> (local pref is explicitly
> stamped as 100 on all incoming routes so it's not a factor in
> the decisions.)
Exclicitely setting local-pref to 100 is usually not necessary, as that's
the default and an eBGP peer cannot influence it.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list