[nsp] 6500 CPU load (Supervisor memory?)

Stephen J. Wilcox steve at telecomplete.co.uk
Tue Oct 21 12:50:30 EDT 2003


icky, your Sup2 is barfing.. thro some more memory at it.. heres a helpful
command (i'm assuming your using native here), dont forget you have two cpus and
two sets of memory and when you type cmds they only pull info on the msfc

remote command switch sh proc mem

Steve

On Tue, 21 Oct 2003, Sam Stickland wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We have a Cisco 6509 fitted with a MFSC-2 with 512Mb RAM, and a Supervisor-2
> fitted with 128Mb RAM.
> 
> When it starts up we get the following error messages from the Sup-2:
> 
> *Oct  9 11:13:19.477: %FIB-3-FIBDISABLE: Fatal error, slot/cpu 1/1104993508:
> ^L^H^
> W^S<8E><84>
> *Oct  9 11:13:18.733: %SYS-SP-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory allocation of 65536 bytes
> failed from 0x4010E1A4, alignment 4
> 48: Pool: Processor  Free: 124576  Cause: Memory fragmentation
> 49: Alternate Pool: None  Free: 0  Cause: No Alternate pool
> 50:
> 51: -Process= "CEF IPC Background", ipl= 0, pid= 102
> 52: -Traceback= 401126CC 40113EE8 4010E1AC 4018BDB0 4018C248 4018C6C8
> 406A73D4 406A7E8
> 4 4069F5E4 406A1E1C 406A9E58 406B8638 406B2120 406B23AC 406B267C 406B2F90
> *Oct  9 11:13:19.465: %FIB-SP-3-NOMEM: Malloc Failure, disabling DCEF on
> linecard
> 
> CPU load on the MFSC is roughly 1% == 0.5Mbit/sec.
> 
> I'm assuming that all this means that the Sup-2 doesn't have enough memory
> to hold the FIB, so the MFSC is having to do a large portion of the work?
> 
> Sam
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list