[nsp] multichassis multilink PPP

[Dennis Peng]

I agree. Multichassis multilink should work for dedicated links. Just
make sure you are doing authentication. Turning off fragmentation
usually helps multilink performance, however in the case of
multichassis multilink, a L2F encapsulated multilink fragment which is
full sized (1500 bytes) will need to be fragmented/reassembled and
hurt performance unless you have a MTU > 1500 linking the sgbp peers.

Dennis

Stephen J. Wilcox [steve at telecomplete.co.uk] wrote:
> i've not tried this but i would assume that sgbp can be configured on any router 
> with the appropriate ios installed and ios doesnt distinguish ppp on dialups to 
> ppp on serials altho i would be a bit concerned about the amount of cpu you will 
> be using when you start doing this on E1s
> 
> i just checked on cisco.com software advisor and it would appear that it is 
> supported on all platforms from 2500 upwards
> 
> Steve
> 
> On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Vincent De Keyzer wrote:
> 
> > Neither do I, for the reason I mentioned in one of the previous posts.
> > 
> > > The original poster asked about Multichassis MPPP, which 
> > > seems to be MPPP with the capability of terminating on 
> > > multiple endpoints on the access server side (e.g., one 
> > > client dialed into 2 different access servers).  He wants to 
> > > have a single MMPPP bundle for 4 E1's between 4 routers (2 on 
> > > each side), which I don't think is possible.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/