[nsp] OSPF legal on Etherchannel subinterfaces?

[Michael Wiley]

This might be a bug...what code?

Pete Templin wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> I'm experimenting with Etherchannel subinterfaces, and finding that I 
> can't get OSPF to develop adjacencies.  Is this legal?  I see one side 
> complaining about bad length:
>
> Apr  2 07:32:35 10.118.28.34 209: Apr  2 07:32:34.129 Central: 
> %OSPF-4-BADLENGTH: Invalid length 52 in OSPF packet from 10.118.28.101 
> (ID 10.118.28.37), Port-channel2.1
>
> Platform is 2xPA-FE-TX on separate VIP2-50 in 7507, talking to another 
> identical platform through a Cat 6509.
>
> Thanks for any assistance,
>
> Pete
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>