[nsp] bgp vulnerability?

[Volodymyr Yakovenko]

On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 03:41:20PM -0400, Dmitry Volkov wrote:
>Interesting..
>How much memory it takes ? what platform ?

Memory requirements should not be significantly bigger.

Platforms - mutualy any, which supports MPLS and has enough memory to satisfy
your (full-view?) BGP requirements. There is no anything special.

Traditional design - Internet in global routing as transport for MPLS VPNs is 
just tradition. You can run global in private address space and Internet
as MPLS VPN.

>Dmitry
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]On Behalf Of Daniel Roesen
>> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2004 2:14 PM
>> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: Re: [nsp] bgp vulnerability?
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 11:47:31AM -0600, Pete Kruckenberg wrote:
>> > It's not immediately obvious to me how a VRF would isolate
>> > iBGP.
>> 
>> I guess he means putting the public Internet into a MPLS L3 VPN.
>> This way, you don't run any IBGP or LDP inside your "public Internet"
>> VRF.
>> 
>> > Could you elaborate or point to educational materials?  
>> 
>> Well, every MPLS L3 VPN literature...
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Daniel
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

-- 
Regards,
Volodymyr.