[c-nsp] 3550 Switches

[Luis Miguel Cruz]

Do you know if there is any other "problem" with MTU into the swiches 
2900,2950 and 3500xl-en?

Andrew Fort wrote:

> Paul Stewart wrote:
> 
>> Why the 3550-12T version and not a 3550-24-EMI for example?  Is there a
>> difference besides 100/1000 on the ports?  This is for low bandwidth 
>> (total
>> of maybe 20 Mb/s at the entire site)...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
> 
> 
> One thing that may effect you depending on your application: 3550-12* 
> support 2K (i.e., 2000) byte MTU (-24* models only support 1546 max 
> mtu).   I think the total (T)CAM resources available (numbers of MAC 
> addresses, routes, etc possible) may also be different?
> 
> cheers,
> andrew
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>