[c-nsp] Carrier Supporting Carrier

[Aditya Kaul]

Yes only Juniper does L2vpn/Vpls via MP-BGP.
Right now i dont think Junos supports IPv4+labels,Infact I had mailed a 
query on both J-NSP/Mpls-Ops with no response.
The Junos can do Labeled unicast which is specific to L3Vpn's.
As far as i know there is no road map for 8.x as junos is still in 6.4 level.

Rgds
Aditya


At 07:41 PM 8/24/2004, Annu Roopa wrote:
>Aditya,
>
>When u make the statement "They do L2vpn(kompella)/VPLS via MP-BGP but now
>have martini(LDP) implementation also." i think u are referring to Juniper 
>right ?
>
>But I heard (not sure) that the new Jun OS version some 8.x is supporting
>EBGP IPv4 + Label. Which version are u referring to ? Anyone know if this 
>is true.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Annu.
>
>
>addie_list at dacafe.com wrote:
>There are 3 options as per Rfc2547b for providing Multi-AS Backbones.
>
>1.Ebgp VRF-VRF between ASBR's.
>2.MP-EBGP between ASBR's for VPN-IPV4 prefix distribution.
>3.Multi-Hop MP-EBGP between PE's for VPN-IPV4 prefix distribution.
>
>Option 3 requires EBGP-IPV4+label functionality between the ASBR's.
>
>This option is also helpfull in implementing Inter-AS L2vpn(martini)as you
>only need a IGP label for PE /32 and have D-LDP session between the PE's
>for vc label xchange.
>
>We have implemented Inter-AS L3/L2 Vpn's across the globe, but platform
>specific for Inter-As L2vpn.
>
>Junos does not support EBGP IPV4+ Label functionality and cisco doesn't
>support L2VPN via MP-BGP so have major inter-op issue there.
>
>They do L2vpn(kompella)/VPLS via MP-BGP but now have martini(LDP)
>implementation also.
>
>Cisco CsC
>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1612/products_feature_guide09186a00800e9572.html
>
>Carrier Supporting Carrier IPv4 BGP Label Distribution
>http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1612/products_feature_guide09186a0080080d1b.html
>
>Juniper 2547bis.
>http://www.juniper.net/solutions/literature/white_papers/200014.pdf
>
>
>
>
>
>Providing an L2vpn/Vpls wrt CsC is better proposition now with the new OAM
>capabilities on both Cisco(VCCV) and Juniper(lsp-ping).
>
>
>Robert,is this for a certain RFP which is floating around }:
>
>
>
>Rgds
>Aditya
>
> > Yes,Robert but would that not also be CsC because when the ISP in US
> > provides
> > only a backbone (no MPLS service ) to the Tier 3 ISP in Asia Pac who is
> > connected
> > to another ISP with another AS # in US (these two have IP and MPLS VPNs)
> > over the
> > bigger ISP.
> >
> > This is how i have understood it because the Deisgn option 2 and 3 of
> > Inter AS VPNs
> > per cisco are very close to the CsC design config. If i have wrongly
> > undertsood can u
> > please add how would one see CsC.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Annu.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------
>Stay ahead of the information curve.
>Receive DCC news and jobs on your desktop daily.
>Subscribe today to the DCC CafeNews newsletter.
>[ http://www10.dcccafe.com/nl/newsletter_subscribe.php ]
>It's informative and essential.
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now.
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/