[c-nsp] OSPF Route

Tantsura, Jeff jeff.tantsura at capgemini.com
Fri Aug 27 03:38:16 EDT 2004


Robert,

By default load balancing per flow (src/dst IP)
In case of NSSA router with lowest RID will do type 7/5 translation.

With kind regards/ met vriendelijke groeten,
--------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Tantsura
CCIE #11416
Senior Consultant
Capgemini Nederland BV
Tel: +31(0)30 689 2866
Mob:+31(0)6 4588 6858
Fax: +31(0)30 689 6565
--------------------------------------------------------


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert Crowe
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 1:38 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] OSPF Route

Given this situation what would be the determining factor on what route
to
use:



A router inside and area is receiving routes from 2 ABR's, equal cost
and installing them in the route table. This includes inter-area and
default routes. What would be the determining factor on which one to
use?  Lowest RID? Interface switching method ?



rwcrowe at comcast.net



_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Our name has changed.  Please update your address book to the following format: "recipient at capgemini.com".

This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,  you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,  distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this  message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all  copies of this message.




More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list