[c-nsp] Load balancing

[Ed Whitesell]

For web traffic, 115001s are much better than when I had used SLB on
6500s and 7200s a couple of years ago.  For UDP services, it's a little
tricky to setup, but it does work well once it is configured.  UDP
traffic is probably easier to setup and manage using SLB, but in the
end, it makes more sense to have all of the load balancing done on the
same hardware, IMHO.

Or, if you have a 6500 or two, I've also heard that the Content
Switching Module for them is pretty good.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ed Whitesell
Network Manager
Airpath
"Clearing the Way"
edw at airpath.com
http://www.airpath.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michel Renfer
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:25 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Load balancing

Hi All!

We're currently looking at various load balancing solutions. Any
comments/experiences regarding the Cisco CSS11500 series? Anyone
using SLB on 72xx?

cheers,
michel

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/