[c-nsp] Question about NAT Rate Limiting

[Kevin Graham]

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:26:16 -0600, Church, Chuck <cchurch at netcogov.com> wrote:
> That's not a bad idea.  I'm thinking a keyword such as 'no-resolve' for
> when you want the DNS name preserved, versus the address.  If
> 'no-resolve' is used and only 1 DNS server is configured, print out a
> warning message, but accept it.  Or something like that...

Even if dependence on DNS is considered unacceptable, atleast being
able to use names as defined by 'ip host' would be great. However,
given the number of places that named ACL's still cannot be used, I'm
skeptical that this will ever be implemented widely enough to really
be worthwhile.