[c-nsp] Load balancing

[Steve Francis]

What load are you running (connections/second) and what is the reported 
CPU usage of the CSM?

Arie Vayner wrote:

>We are using stateless failover and it is ok...
>The only major point is that the 2 CSM's would not sync their config
>automatically, so you have to do it manually (it should be fixed in a
>future release)
>Also, there is a stateful mechanism, which just syncs up the state
>tables between the 2 CSM's
>
>The whole mechanism is build around HSRP
>
>Arie 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Brant I. Stevens [mailto:branto at branto.com] 
>Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 4:17 PM
>To: Tantsura, Jeff; Arie Vayner; Michel Renfer;
>cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Load balancing
>
>Out of curiosity, how is stateful failover (inter-chassis) handled on
>the CSM?
>
>
>On 12/23/2004 09:06 AM, "Tantsura, Jeff" <jeff.tantsura at capgemini.com>
>wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I used CSM's on 65xx, work just fine, although there are some tricks, 
>>especially in combination with FW blade.
>>I've been using Alteon's since 2001, great switch but it's Nortel
>>    
>>
>now...
>  
>
>>not my favourite hardware vendor.
>>You could consider F5 as well.
>>
>>Jeff
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
>>[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Arie Vayner
>>Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 9:54 AM
>>To: Michel Renfer; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Load balancing
>>
>>We are using the CSM for some applications like tunnels, DNS and other
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>things, and it works just great Arie
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
>>[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Michel Renfer
>>Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:25 PM
>>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>Subject: [c-nsp] Load balancing
>>
>>Hi All!
>>
>>We're currently looking at various load balancing solutions. Any 
>>comments/experiences regarding the Cisco CSS11500 series? Anyone using
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>SLB on 72xx?
>>
>>cheers,
>>michel
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>This message contains information that may be privileged or 
>>confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is 
>>intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not 
>>the intended recipient,  you are not authorized to read, print, 
>>retain, copy, disseminate,  distribute, or use this message or any 
>>part thereof. If you receive this  message in error, please notify the
>>    
>>
>sender immediately and delete all  copies of this message.
>  
>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net 
>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>    
>>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>  
>