[nsp] stupid NAT tricks

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Sun Feb 29 13:49:09 EST 2004


On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 11:43:00AM -0700, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
> Thank you for the clarification.  Wouldn't I want to give the client inside
> the 'ip nat inside' interface a static non-routable IP and then exclude that
> client from the NAT ACL?  

I don't fully grok that question.

If the IP is non-routeable, and you exclude it from NAT, what do you gain?

USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list