[nsp] stupid NAT tricks

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 11:43:00AM -0700, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
> Thank you for the clarification.  Wouldn't I want to give the client inside
> the 'ip nat inside' interface a static non-routable IP and then exclude that
> client from the NAT ACL?  

I don't fully grok that question.

If the IP is non-routeable, and you exclude it from NAT, what do you gain?

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de