[nsp] IPinIP Tunnel termination on Cat4500
RANGARIRAYI MUVAVARIRWA
muvavarirwa at msn.com
Sat Jan 24 10:18:43 EST 2004
An IPinIP tunnel is implemented across two catalyst switches as follows:
1. Cat4500_VLAN400 <==> IPinIP <==> Cat3500_VLAN400
2. OSPFv2 across tunnel interface
The following behavior is observed:
3. Failure to complete FULL OSPF adjacency
3.1 Cat3500 side goes into INIT state
3.2 Cat4500 side goes into NULL state (-)
4. Input queue drops observed Tunnel_Interface_Cat4500
ACTION
5. Increased HOLD-QUEUE IN on Tunnel_Interface_Cat4500 to match value on
corresponding Physical Interface (2000)
RESULT
6. OSPF Adjacency came back
ISSUE
When we 'stress' tested this link, SUPRISINGLY packet drops and OSPF
adjacency loss returned when sending more than 40kbps...this is too low a
threshold a Cat4500.
QUESTION
Does the cat4500 significantly de-prioritize Tunnel (IPinIP in this case)
processing compared physical interfaces? i.e does the cat4500 process switch
IPinIP traffic? Conversely, is there a way to improve IPinIP traffic
processing on Cat4500?
Note: Cat4500 is running 12.1(13)EW
regards,
Ranga Muvavarirwa
_________________________________________________________________
Check out the coupons and bargains on MSN Offers!
http://shopping.msn.com/softcontent/softcontent.aspx?scmId=1418
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list