[c-nsp] Verifying BGP Propragation
Stephen J. Wilcox
steve at telecomplete.co.uk
Mon Jul 26 13:51:52 EDT 2004
so this is expected behaviour
the key point here is that to provide transit you need to maintain as good paths
as your competition which may include v large ISPs, in particular minimising how
much of your transit customer traffic goes to your transit suppliers will help
at this point you drop into a peering vs transit debate and a whole bunch of
associated economics which states even if you can buy transit for $10/mb you
have to spend $30/mb to maintain a network if you want to stay in the game
Steve
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Paul Stewart wrote:
> Hi Michael...
>
> When I do show ip bgp nei x.x.x.x advertised-routes I see the prefixes
> leaving our system to the upstreams. According to the upstreams both are
> making it through their system which I can verify with one upstream on their
> looking glass (level3). With the other upsteam I do not see the
> advertisement on their looking glass however this upstream (Bell Nexxia) is
> apparantly directly connected to Hydro One Telecom which is where our
> downstream gets their other pipe from. So I'm told by Bell Nexxia that we
> would be an AS hop further away (which makes sense).
>
> At this point I'm unable to confirm or see the routes for our downsteam
> (which by the way is AS14456). We are AS11666.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Earls, Michael [mailto:Michael.Earls at 53.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 6:33 PM
> To: 'Paul Stewart'; 'NSP List'
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Verifying BGP Propragation
>
>
> You can do some show commands on your side to verify that you are sending
> them your prefixes, Do es either route show up when looking at the looking
> glass?
>
> shwo ip bgp neighbors x.x.x.x advertised-routes
>
> michael
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Stewart [mailto:pauls at nexicom.net]
> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 4:38 PM
> To: 'NSP List'
> Subject: [c-nsp] Verifying BGP Propragation
>
>
> Hi there...
>
> We have a downstream connection that I'm trying to confirm is actually
> appearing through two of our pipes. The downstream has good connectivity
> through other providers so a lot of their inbound traffic is closer than
> what we are offering them.
>
> When I try various looking glass sites and route servers our path doesn't
> showup most of the time, if any of the time.
>
> How can I verify that filters are not blocking their advertisements from us
> effectively? I have talked to both upstreams and they confirm that
> advertisements are showing up on their edge and passing through....
>
> Seems like a really basic thing, but I want to make sure...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
> This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may
> be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If
> you receive this e-mail in error, please do not read, copy or disseminate it
> in any manner. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is
> prohibited. Please reply to the message immediately by informing the sender
> that the message was misdirected. After replying, please erase it from your
> computer system. Your assistance in correcting this error is appreciated.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list