[nsp] low-end L3 switch

[Tantsura, Jeff]

Hi,

I'd recommend 3750 instead.
The difference in price is about $1000 list price.

Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ralph Doncaster
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 12:48 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [nsp] low-end L3 switch

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Gert Doering wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 03:29:38PM -0400, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
> > Is the 2948G-L3 the bottom of the line for a cisco L3 switch that
> > can do BGP?
>
> The 2948G-L3 is the definite bottom line of anything.
>
> Avoid it like the plague.

So what woud you recommend instead 3550-EMI?
Does anyone know what Cogent uses for their customer-facing L3 switch?
Whatever they use does BGP, but not a full table since that comes from a
multihop feed to one of their GSRs.
http://www.cogentco.com/Guide/User%20Guide%20V5.pdf

-Ralph
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/




Our name has changed.  Please update your address book to the following format: "recipient at capgemini.com".

This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,  you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,  distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this  message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all  copies of this message.