[nsp] ATMoMPLS question

[Murray, John]

 Hello,

 is it possible to do 'mpls l2transport route x.x.x.x yy' for ethernet
on two interfaces of the same PE?

Thanks

John

-----Original Message-----
From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) [mailto:oboehmer at cisco.com] 
Sent: 15 June 2004 07:02
To: Bruce Robertson
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [nsp] ATMoMPLS question

Hi Bruce

> I'm trying to use the "mpls l2transport route x.x.x.x yy" config to 
> tie two PVCs together with ATMoMPLS.  Unfortunately, one of the 
> requirements is that "x.x.x.x yy" must be unique on a router, and the 
> two PVCs happen to be on different interfaces on the same router.  Is 
> there any way to get this to work when there is only one PE router?
> It's important that this gets done at layer 2, as I will have no idea 
> what L3 and above protocols my customer might be using on a particular

> PVC.  I don't really care whether it's with AToM, or some
> other technique.       

The feature you are looking for is called "Layer 2 Local Switching" and
is available in 12.0(27)S on c7200 and c7500 (see
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft
/120limit/120s/120s27/fslocal.htm). It is not available in 12.3
mainline.

	oli

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

________________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the CitC Virus
Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information visit
http://www.citc.it

___

________________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the 
CitC Virus Scanning Service powered by SkyLabs. For further information visit
http://www.citc.it

___